![]() ![]() Officers conducted a traffic stop on the Ford Aerostar and spoke with Wilson, who was in the driver’s seat. Wilson was listed as the registered owner of the vehicle. ![]() Utilizing a license plate tracking system, officers located a van matching this description a few miles from the incident location. After conducting an investigation at the crime scene, officers determined that the shooter was a “black male” driving a teal green “s model Ford Aerostar van” with a missing hubcap. The record shows that, on January 28, 2021, Bradly Jordan was shot and killed while performing pest control services at an apartment complex. Applying that standard here, we see no error in the trial court’s order. The State appeals the trial court’s pretrial ruling pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (5), and we have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. 75, 78 (673 SE2d 237) (2009) Wilson was indicted for, among other things, murder in connection with the shooting death of Bradly Jordan. In reviewing the trial court’s grant of the motion to suppress, “we apply the well-established principles that the trial court’s findings as to disputed facts will be upheld unless clearly erroneous and the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo review.” State v. 1 The State contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the search warrant issued for Wilson’s cell phones was overbroad and authorized a general search in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The State appeals from the grant of defendant Roceam Wilson’s motion to suppress. In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: FebruS22A0967. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. ![]() The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |